Thursday, December 17, 2009
Monday, December 14, 2009
Monday, December 7, 2009
Pessimism, Realism, and the Birth of a Superhero
Contemplating the crisis in healthcare, global warming, and topsoil erosion leaves me pessimistic, concluding that modern culture does not serve us well. However, pessimism doesn’t work to solve such big issues, which require a more optimistic, can-do approach, so I strive to leave pessimism behind me.
Although change may be rational (eating healthy food versus junk, for example), the sheer force of cultural momentum means that change is not readily forthcoming. However, as the negative results of current behaviors appear, such as childhood obesity, forces arise in opposition to the status quo.
A rational revolution evolves when there are frameworks to channel these reactive forces. We founded Nature’s Express to create just one such framework.
A second requirement for a cultural revolution is abundant wisdom. Such wisdom keeps an optimistic perspective despite significant negative momentum. Such wisdom (think Gandhi) also embodies the unconditional love that overcomes the hostility and fear of the status quo.
I realize all this, yet often slip back into pessimism. Alas, my love for mankind still is somewhat this side of unconditional. I am, as yet, no Gandhi.
TurnipMan to the Rescue
TurnipMan has been a rather silent logo since the inception of Nature’s Express, waiting for branding to design his purpose. Although kids seem naturally drawn to him, his corporate persona has remained somewhat vague - but no longer.
TurnipMan will become the Nature’s Express symbol of optimism, embodying everyone’s wish to do good deeds. He loves all and wants to serve everyone healthier food. Courageous, yet filled with consummate compassion, he is as joyful as the Dalai Lama in the face of adversity. He wishes to learn to fly and wants a superhero’s cape for his birthday!
Through his unbounded optimism and good cheer, TurnipMan hopes to become a world-changing ambassador.
When you see him, wish him luck, buy a burger, and leave a tip.
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
No, eggs should be limited to just an occasional food.
A friend recently e-mailed an MSN on-line “health & fitness” article highlighting their 25 Ridiculously Healthy Foods. Number one on MSN’s healthy list was eggs. In general, eggs have had a bit of resurgence in the popular press as a healthy food after many years of concern about their high level of cholesterol. Unfortunately this is a grave misconception; eggs are not a health food and just one or more eggs a day is correlated with the development of diabetes, congestive heart disease, and a statistical increase in the death rate.
Today’s blog confronts two of the issues causing confusion about nutrition in general and then addresses some concerns specifically about eggs.
#1. “Big Tobacco Tactics” – The business of generating confusion
The painting, Skull with a Burning Cigarette, is Van Gogh’s 1886 rendition of the prevailing thoughts on smoking over a century ago – “it ruins your lungs and then it kills you”. Some forty years later Van Gogh’s prescience was confirmed when articles began appearing in the medical literature correlating smoking with lung cancer and early death. In 1964, almost eighty years after Van Gogh painted his smoking skeleton, the U. S. Surgeon General concluded that smoking was harmful.
In his book, Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health, David Michaels exposes how the tobacco industry created paralyzing doubt despite scientific certainty. By combating legitimate science with “industry experts”, Big Tobacco not only stalled regulations for decades, but also reassured smokers that the risk to their health was not that great. Dr. Michaels then goes on to detail how the tactics used by the tobacco industry were adapted by other industries (asbestos, coal, chrome, arsenic, mercury, beryllium, and others) to question legitimate scientific findings with what was essentially industry-sponsored propaganda.
I believe that “buyer beware” is the correct bias whenever assessing an industry’s defense of the safety of its product.
#2. Culture and nutrition at loggerheads – The myth about protein
In The China Study, perhaps the most important book ever written on nutrition, Dr. Colin Campbell outlines the discoveries of his highly respected scientific career, focusing on the findings from the most extensive epidemiological study ever done. The conclusions were as startling as they were statistically unequivocal. Numerous supporting studies have since confirmed one of the key findings: the high level of protein in our diet is not healthy.
Despite the cultural drumbeat that we need lots of protein, the truth is that we don’t. Heart disease, cancer, strokes, and diabetes are all diseases that are related to the excess animal protein in our diet.
As Galileo learned when publicizing his findings that the earth goes around the sun and not vice versa as had been believed, a scientific finding that does not conform to cultural norms is often not well received. Although the data on protein seems irrefutable, it is not popular, and so the myth about needing high levels of protein continues.
#3 Health issues and eggs –
A widely cited 1999 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association found no significant differences in coronary heart disease and stroke in those eating an increased number of eggs. This would be reassuring except for three more recent articles with the following highly statistically significant findings:
Ø Higher rates of death with higher egg consumption (1)
Ø Increased risk of heart failure with increased egg consumption (2)
Ø Increased risk of type 2 diabetes with increased egg consumption (3)
Both the 1999 article and the three articles published since 2008 were large and well respected studies.
The later studies also did not show an increase in coronary artery disease with increased egg consumption. On the other hand, heart failure, type 2 diabetes and overall death rate were significantly increased with eating 7 eggs or more per week compared to one or less eggs per week.
Particularly concerning was the doubling of the death rate in people with diabetes who ate an average of one or more eggs per day.
So, since this data seems clear, where does the controversy come from? How can eggs appear on a most healthy foods list? Here one needs to remember the tactics of Big Tobacco.
One would assume that a 23% increase in mortality, a 64% increase in congestive heart disease, and a 58% increased risk in developing diabetes would be headline news. After all, we eat over 200 million eggs a day. But consumers have not decreased their egg intakes after these studies were published. Why not?
Ø Most have never heard about the studies in the first place.
Ø If one did hear a report about those studies, nutrition information is so confusing because of conflicting data that one isn’t sure what to do.
Ø One loves eggs and/or hates statistics to the point where one just doesn’t bother with inconvenient findings.
These three points are key to remember if one wants to sell more eggs.
In general, industry studies are more widely publicized because favorable findings, no matter how biased, are sent as press releases to every media outlet. When there is damaging data, one can expect the study to be questioned on highly technical and methodological grounds. One can also expect massive diversionary marketing to occur whenever the media covers negative results.
In conclusion, you can be certain that most of what you read or hear about eggs is the industry’s attempts to “egg you on”.
An example of industry positioning would be a recent on-line article in “Risk Analysis”. This research, paid for by the egg industry’s Egg Nutrition Center, concluded:
…”focusing on decreasing egg intake as an approach to modify coronary heart disease risk would be expected to yield minimal results relative to changing other behaviors such as smoking and other dietary habits.”
This conclusion is consistent with the data, but effectively diverts one’s attention from the more significant facts - congestive heart failure, diabetes, and death rates go up as people eat more eggs.
I would offer three conclusions:
#1. Be wary of industry generated media and industry sponsored research.
#2. Remember that “we need a lot of protein” may be a cultural mantra, but it is not true.
#3. Eggs should not be on your list of most healthy foods.